The Politics of Politics

By Simon Howell


No news is good news apparently; but not in the case of Zimbabwe. While I really do not want this to become yet another article on the Zimbabwe fiasco, what the electoral nightmare does raise is one simple question which then leads to a number of very complicated questions. That question, simply stated, is






do despotic leaders cling to power like limpets to a dry stone (I assume, for the moment, that Mugabe is a despot)? With this in mind I want to try see if there might be some reasoning behind this desperation.


The first thing to note is that if a despotic leader clings to power, by whatever means necessary, then this is pretty much an admittance of complicity in whatever they are accused of doing (the




raison d’être

of calling them a despot in the first place). If not, then why are they afraid of losing power? Now this is contradictory for if they rose to power in a dust shower of praise “for the people, by the people” (as they normally do), then surely they would do whatever they can to reaffirm their link with “the people”? This reaffirmation, paradoxically, would then mean giving up power. If the despot is simply afraid of losing power, for power’s sake, then this seems reason enough. However there are generally a couple more violent reasons for trying to remain in power.


One Response to The Politics of Politics

  1. loomisnews says:

    If ya want the media to pay attention to Zimbabwe, you’ll have to have the Rev. Wright give a speech about it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: